Is the Predator Franchise Still Hunting for Success? Predator: Badlands has finally hit theaters, marking director Dan Trachtenberg’s third foray into the iconic sci-fi horror universe. Following the critically acclaimed Prey (set in 1719) and the animated anthology Predator: Killer of Killers—both Hulu exclusives—Trachtenberg’s latest installment promises to shake things up. But here’s where it gets controversial: does Badlands continue the franchise’s winning streak, or is it a misstep in the jungle? JoBlo’s Chris Bumbray gave it a solid 7/10 (check out his full review here or watch the video above), but now we want to hear from you. What did you think?
The film’s premise is as ambitious as it is intriguing. According to early casting calls, Predator: Badlands was billed as a groundbreaking story centered on the complex relationship between two sisters, Thia and Tessa, played by the versatile Elle Fanning. Thia, a sheltered yet brilliant lab-raised scientist, and Tessa, a fiercely determined militant, find their bond tested as their paths diverge in a high-stakes mission. But this is the part most people miss: the casting call specifically sought an actress who could embody both characters’ extremes—Thia’s naive enthusiasm and Tessa’s unrelenting drive. Fanning’s dual performance is undoubtedly a highlight, but does it elevate the film, or does it get lost in the chaos of the narrative?
Set on a remote planet in the future, the official synopsis reveals a young Predator, exiled from his clan, forming an unlikely alliance with Thia (Fanning) as they embark on a perilous quest for the ultimate adversary. Produced by heavyweights like John Davis and Marc Toberoff, and starring Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi as the lead Predator, the film aims to blend character-driven drama with the franchise’s signature action. Yet, the question remains: does it strike the right balance, or does it falter in its attempt to innovate?
Here’s the controversial take: While Prey was praised for its fresh take on the Predator mythos, Badlands seems to lean harder into emotional storytelling and sibling dynamics. Is this a welcome evolution, or does it stray too far from what fans love about the franchise? And let’s not forget the sci-fi setting—does it add depth, or does it feel like a gimmick?
We want to hear your thoughts! Is Dan Trachtenberg on a roll, or is he risking the franchise’s identity? Drop a comment below and let’s spark a debate. After all, isn’t that what great movies—and great fandoms—are all about?
